Termination w.r.t. Q proof of TRS/AG01#3.16.trs

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

times(x, 0) → 0
times(x, s(y)) → plus(times(x, y), x)
plus(x, 0) → x
plus(0, x) → x
plus(x, s(y)) → s(plus(x, y))
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

times(x, 0) → 0
times(x, s(y)) → plus(times(x, y), x)
plus(x, 0) → x
plus(0, x) → x
plus(x, s(y)) → s(plus(x, y))
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))

Q is empty.

The TRS is overlay and locally confluent. By [15] we can switch to innermost.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

times(x, 0) → 0
times(x, s(y)) → plus(times(x, y), x)
plus(x, 0) → x
plus(0, x) → x
plus(x, s(y)) → s(plus(x, y))
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

times(x0, 0)
times(x0, s(x1))
plus(x0, 0)
plus(0, x0)
plus(x0, s(x1))
plus(s(x0), x1)

Using Dependency Pairs [1,13] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(s(x), y) → PLUS(x, y)
TIMES(x, s(y)) → TIMES(x, y)
TIMES(x, s(y)) → PLUS(times(x, y), x)
PLUS(x, s(y)) → PLUS(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

times(x, 0) → 0
times(x, s(y)) → plus(times(x, y), x)
plus(x, 0) → x
plus(0, x) → x
plus(x, s(y)) → s(plus(x, y))
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

times(x0, 0)
times(x0, s(x1))
plus(x0, 0)
plus(0, x0)
plus(x0, s(x1))
plus(s(x0), x1)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(s(x), y) → PLUS(x, y)
TIMES(x, s(y)) → TIMES(x, y)
TIMES(x, s(y)) → PLUS(times(x, y), x)
PLUS(x, s(y)) → PLUS(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

times(x, 0) → 0
times(x, s(y)) → plus(times(x, y), x)
plus(x, 0) → x
plus(0, x) → x
plus(x, s(y)) → s(plus(x, y))
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

times(x0, 0)
times(x0, s(x1))
plus(x0, 0)
plus(0, x0)
plus(x0, s(x1))
plus(s(x0), x1)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted some edges using various graph approximations

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

            ↳ QDP

              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(s(x), y) → PLUS(x, y)
TIMES(x, s(y)) → TIMES(x, y)
TIMES(x, s(y)) → PLUS(times(x, y), x)
PLUS(x, s(y)) → PLUS(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

times(x, 0) → 0
times(x, s(y)) → plus(times(x, y), x)
plus(x, 0) → x
plus(0, x) → x
plus(x, s(y)) → s(plus(x, y))
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

times(x0, 0)
times(x0, s(x1))
plus(x0, 0)
plus(0, x0)
plus(x0, s(x1))
plus(s(x0), x1)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [13,14,18] contains 2 SCCs with 1 less node.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

            ↳ QDP

              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                ↳ AND

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(s(x), y) → PLUS(x, y)
PLUS(x, s(y)) → PLUS(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

times(x, 0) → 0
times(x, s(y)) → plus(times(x, y), x)
plus(x, 0) → x
plus(0, x) → x
plus(x, s(y)) → s(plus(x, y))
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

times(x0, 0)
times(x0, s(x1))
plus(x0, 0)
plus(0, x0)
plus(x0, s(x1))
plus(s(x0), x1)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

PLUS(s(x), y) → PLUS(x, y)
PLUS(x, s(y)) → PLUS(x, y)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
PLUS(x1, x2) = PLUS(x1, x2)
s(x1) = s(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

[PLUS₂, s_1]

Status:

s₁: [1]
PLUS₂: [2,1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

            ↳ QDP

              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                ↳ AND

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ PisEmptyProof

                  ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

times(x, 0) → 0
times(x, s(y)) → plus(times(x, y), x)
plus(x, 0) → x
plus(0, x) → x
plus(x, s(y)) → s(plus(x, y))
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

times(x0, 0)
times(x0, s(x1))
plus(x0, 0)
plus(0, x0)
plus(x0, s(x1))
plus(s(x0), x1)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

            ↳ QDP

              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                ↳ AND

                  ↳ QDP

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TIMES(x, s(y)) → TIMES(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

times(x, 0) → 0
times(x, s(y)) → plus(times(x, y), x)
plus(x, 0) → x
plus(0, x) → x
plus(x, s(y)) → s(plus(x, y))
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

times(x0, 0)
times(x0, s(x1))
plus(x0, 0)
plus(0, x0)
plus(x0, s(x1))
plus(s(x0), x1)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

TIMES(x, s(y)) → TIMES(x, y)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
TIMES(x1, x2) = TIMES(x2)
s(x1) = s(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

s₁ > TIMES₁

Status:

TIMES₁: [1]
s₁: [1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

            ↳ QDP

              ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                ↳ AND

                  ↳ QDP

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ PisEmptyProof

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

times(x, 0) → 0
times(x, s(y)) → plus(times(x, y), x)
plus(x, 0) → x
plus(0, x) → x
plus(x, s(y)) → s(plus(x, y))
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

times(x0, 0)
times(x0, s(x1))
plus(x0, 0)
plus(0, x0)
plus(x0, s(x1))
plus(s(x0), x1)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.